Why North Carolina Amazon Workers Voted Against Unionizing

The Union Vote That Shook Amazon's Foundations

In a decisive vote announced on February 15, 2025, workers at Amazon's Garner, North Carolina warehouse cast their ballots against unionizing. Out of 3,276 votes, a staggering 74.7% were opposed to forming a union, while only 25.3% favored it. While the results are still pending certification by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), they reflect a significant moment in Amazon's ongoing labor relations saga.

Why Workers Chose Not to Unionize

The Carolina Amazonians United for Solidarity and Empowerment (CAUSE), the worker group that campaigned for unionization, attributed the vote's outcome to Amazon's alleged intimidation tactics throughout the election process. They stated, "Amazon's relentless and illegal efforts to intimidate us prove that this company is afraid of workers coming together to claim our power." In contrast, Amazon representative Eileen Hards asserted that they had not broken any laws and welcomed the decision, emphasizing their preference for direct communication with employees.

The Larger Context of Labor Relations at Amazon

This vote marks a critical juncture in Amazon's history, as the company has faced rising scrutiny over working conditions and labor practices. Despite a few successful unionization efforts at other Amazon facilities—such as a Staten Island warehouse in 2022—North Carolina remains a challenging landscape for organized labor. The state recorded the lowest union membership rate in the nation at just 2.4% last year, showcasing the uphill battle for union activists.

At the Garner warehouse, where starting wages are $18.50 per hour, CAUSE leaders had sought to negotiate for $30 per hour and improved working conditions, including longer breaks. These demands highlight the industry's intense focus on labor rights amidst a growing public dialogue around worker treatment.

The Broader Implications of This Vote

The overwhelming rejection of unionization in North Carolina could set a precedent for other Amazon facilities contemplating similar actions. With unions seeking to expand their reach into companies with significant employee counts, the Garner vote serves as both a victory and a rallying point for Amazon executives who have vowed to maintain a non-union workforce. While unions have recently enjoyed increased public support—67% of Americans express approval for labor unions—this does not seem to translate into higher member rates. The current trend reflects a complex negotiation between labor movements and corporate rights, especially within the tech and retail giants like Amazon.

Conclusion: The Ongoing Fight for Workers’ Rights

As labor movements push for change in the corporate landscape, the Garner vote highlights the intricate dynamics between employee rights, corporate stance, and legislative environments. Workers and their advocates are expected to continue fighting for better conditions, even as significant setbacks occur. The pathway for unions at Amazon and beyond remains fraught with challenges and opportunities that will likely reshape the future of work in America.